Study area delineated using sage‐grouse range as a proxy to define sagebrush biome. The study area was divided into three areas (Great Basin, Rocky Mountains, and Great Plains) along gradients of broader ecosystem water balance as shown.

This study looks at mesic resource productivity in sagebrush landscapes across the Intermountain West in regards to food resource availability for Greater and Gunnison sage-grouse.

Access the full study here.

Principal Investigators
J. Patrick Donnelly, Brady W. Allred, Daniel Perret, Nicholas L. Silverman, Jason D. Tack, Victoria J. Dreitz, Jeremy D. Maestas, and David E. Naugle.

The North American semi‐arid sagebrush, Artemisia spp., biome exhibits considerable climatic complexity driving dynamic spatiotemporal shifts in primary productivity. Greater and Gunnison sage‐grouse, Centrocercus urophasianus and C. minimus , are adapted to patterns of resource intermittence and rely on stable adult survival supplemented by occasional recruitment pulses when climatic conditions are favorable. Predictions of intensifying water scarcity raise concerns over new demographic bottlenecks impacting sage‐grouse populations in drought‐sensitive landscapes. We estimate biome‐wide mesic resource productivity from 1984 to 2016 using remote sensing to identify patterns of food availability influencing selective pressures on sage‐grouse. We linked productivity to abiotic factors to examine effects of seasonal drought across time, space, and land tenure, with findings partitioned along gradients of ecosystem water balance within Great Basin, Rocky Mountains and Great Plains regions. Precipitation was the driver of mesic resource abundance explaining ≥70% of variance in drought‐limited vegetative productivity. Spatiotemporal shifts in mesic abundance were apparent given biome‐wide climatic trends that reduced precipitation below three‐quarters of normal in 20% of years. Drought sensitivity structured grouse populations wherein landscapes with the greatest uncertainty in mesic abundance and distribution supported the fewest grouse. Privately owned lands encompassed 40% of sage‐grouse range, but contained a disproportional 68% of mesic resources. Regional drought sensitivity identified herein acted as ecological minimums to influence differences in landscape carrying capacity across sage‐grouse range. Our model depictions likely reflect a new normal in water scarcity that could compound impacts of demographic bottlenecks in Great Basin and Great Plains. We conclude that long‐term population maintenance depends on a diversity of drought resistant mesic resources that offset climate driven variability in vegetative productivity. We recommend a holistic public–private lands approach to mesic restoration to offset a deepening risk of water scarcity.